Transparency · Research · Accuracy
Our Methodology
Every tool and article on NoGymLab is calibrated to peer-reviewed sources. This page documents the formulas we use, the journals we draw from, how content is reviewed before publication, and what we do when something needs to be corrected.
- 📄 Peer-reviewed formulas
- 📚 Cited sources
- 🔄 Regular reviews
- 🌍 EN · FR · IT · ES · DE · AR
Why we document this
Fitness and nutrition content online often presents conclusions without showing the reasoning. Readers cannot tell whether a calorie target comes from a validated equation or an approximation a writer preferred. NoGymLab is built differently: every number in every tool is traceable to a published formula, and every claim in every article is linked to its source.
This page is not marketing. It is the working documentation for our tools — the same reference our authors use when selecting formulas and that our cross-reviewer checks against before an article is published.
Tool formulas
The six formulas below power all current NoGymLab calculators. Each entry shows the equation, which tools use it, and the publication it was validated in.
- Mifflin-St Jeor Calorie Deficit · TDEE · IF
Men: RMR = (10 × weight_kg) + (6.25 × height_cm) − (5 × age) + 5 Women: RMR = (10 × weight_kg) + (6.25 × height_cm) − (5 × age) − 161Most accurate resting metabolic rate estimate for non-athletes.
Frankenfield D. et al., J Am Diet Assoc, 2005 · PMID 15883556
- Cunningham TDEE (LBM variant) · Recomp
RMR = 500 + (22 × lean_body_mass_kg)Preferred for athletes where lean mass is known.
Cunningham JJ., Am J Clin Nutr, 1980 · PMID 7369169
- TDEE Activity Multipliers All TDEE tools
Sedentary ×1.200 Lightly active ×1.375 Moderately active ×1.550 Very active ×1.725 Extremely active ×1.900Applied to RMR to estimate total daily energy expenditure.
Harris-Benedict 1919 / Roza-Shizgal revision 1984
- Protein Intake Targets Macro Calculator · Cutting Protocol
Fat loss: 1.6–2.4 g/kg body weight Muscle gain: 1.6–2.2 g/kg body weight Maintenance: 1.2–1.6 g/kg body weight Aggressive deficit: up to 3.1 g/kg LBMRanges account for training age, body composition, and goal.
Stokes T. et al., Nutrients, 2018 · Morton RW et al., BJSM, 2018 · Helms ER et al., JISSN, 2014
- BMI (WHO Classification) BMI Calculator
BMI = weight_kg ÷ (height_m)²WHO cut-points used. BMI does not account for body composition.
WHO Expert Consultation, Lancet, 2004 · Romero-Corral A. et al., Int J Obes, 2008
- Lean Body Mass — Boer LBM Calculator · TDEE
Men: LBM = (0.407 × weight_kg) + (0.267 × height_cm) − 19.2 Women: LBM = (0.252 × weight_kg) + (0.473 × height_cm) − 48.3Population-validated LBM estimate from anthropometric inputs only.
Boer P., J Appl Physiol, 1984 · PMID 6737172
Research sources
Primary citations are drawn from PubMed-indexed journals. We do not cite secondary summaries or general-interest health websites in place of original studies.
| Journal / Source | Abbr. | Primary use on NoGymLab |
|---|---|---|
| Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition | JISSN | Protein targets, supplementation, body composition |
| The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition | AJCN | Macronutrients, energy balance, metabolic adaptation |
| Nutrients (MDPI, open access) | Nutrients | Micronutrients, diet patterns, weight management |
| British Journal of Sports Medicine | BJSM | Training load, injury prevention, performance |
| Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research | JSCR | Resistance training, programming, periodisation |
| International Journal of Obesity | Int J Obes | BMI validity, adiposity, weight-loss interventions |
| ISSN Position Stands | ISSN | Consensus reference for sports nutrition guidelines |
| ACSM Guidelines for Exercise Testing | ACSM | Exercise prescription, cardiorespiratory standards |
| WHO Technical Reports & Expert Consultations | WHO | BMI classification, global health reference values |
| PubMed (National Library of Medicine) | PubMed | Primary database for all citation verification |
Visual execution standards
Exercise illustrations and diagrams follow four production rules to ensure accuracy and reproducibility.
-
Exercise demonstrations use neutral anatomical positions that are reproducible without equipment or a trainer present.
-
Diagrams prioritise functional clarity over aesthetic complexity — every element serves the instruction.
-
All visual assets are original or properly licensed; no stock exercise photos are used without verifying the depicted form.
-
Illustrations are reviewed by the domain author before publication and updated when technique guidance evolves.
Review process
Every article and tool follows a five-stage process from research to publication.
- Research
The responsible author identifies primary sources and selects formulas or protocols with the strongest evidence base for the intended audience.
- Draft
Content is drafted with inline citations. Every formula, figure, and claim is linked to its source before internal review begins.
- Cross-review
The other author independently tests all calculations, checks that citations support the claims, and flags any scope limitations not already stated.
- Quality check
Content is checked for readability, accurate language, and consistent use of units and notation before the final publication pass.
- Publish & schedule
Published pages carry a "Last reviewed" date and are placed in the annual review queue. Time-sensitive changes are handled as corrections.
Our commitments
-
Source transparency
Every formula and figure links to its published origin. Readers can follow every citation directly to the source.
-
Version dating
Every page and tool carries a "Last reviewed" date. When a formula is updated, the previous version and its deprecation date are logged here.
-
Correction priority
Confirmed errors are corrected before new content is published. We acknowledge reports within 5 working days.
-
No affiliate influence
Formula choices are never modified for commercial or sponsorship reasons. No undisclosed paid content appears on NoGymLab.
Corrections
Found an error? Email us at hello@nogymlab.com. Please include the page URL and the specific claim, figure, or formula in question. We investigate and correct confirmed errors within 5 working days. Corrections are noted with a date in the affected article or tool page.
Tool formula updates follow the same policy: the previous version, the reason for the change, and the deprecation date are recorded on this page.